27 Pages Posted: 24 Oct 2005
Date Written: September 2005
We exploit an incentive change in professional soccer leagues aimed at encouraging more attacking and goal scoring to obtain evidence on the effect of stronger incentives on productive and destructive effort. Using as control the behavior of the same teams in a competition that experienced no changes in incentives, we provide differences-in-differences estimates of the effect of the incentive change on the behavior of teams. We find that, although teams increased offensive effort, they also increased destructive effort ('sabotage') substantially, resulting in no net change in scoring. When ahead, teams became more conservative, increasing their defenders, scoring less goals, and allowing fewer attempts to score by their opponents. We also find that teams that engage more in sabotage activities depress the attendance at their rival's home stadiums, and that indeed attendance suffered as a result of the incentive change. Thus, teams responded to stronger incentives, but in an undesirable way.
Keywords: Incentives, sabotage, multitasking, tournaments
JEL Classification: D21, D82, J41, L14, M52, M55
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Garicano, Luis and Palacios-Huerta, Ignacio Isabel, Sabotage in Tournaments: Making the Beautiful Game a Bit Less Beautiful (September 2005). CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5231. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=831964
This is a CEPR Discussion Paper. CEPR charges a fee of $5.00 for this paper.Login using your CEPR Personal Profile
File name: SSRN-id831964.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.