48 Pages Posted: 26 Oct 2005
Date Written: June 2006
We develop a flexible, citations- and reference-intensity-adjusted ranking technique that allows a specified set of journals to be evaluated using a range of alternative criteria. We also distinguish between the influence of a journal and that of a journal article, with the latter concept arguably being more relevant for measuring research productivity. The list of top economics journals can (but does not necessarily) change noticeably when one examines citations in the social science and policy literatures, and when one measures citations on a perarticle basis. The changes in rankings are due to the broad interest in applied microeconomics and economic development, to differences in citation norms and in the relative importance assigned to theoretical and empirical contributions, and to the lack of a systematic effect of journal size on influence per article. We also find that economics is comparatively selfcontained but nevertheless draws knowledge from a range of other disciplines. This paper was revised in August 2006.
Keywords: economics journals, social sciences journals, policy journals, rankings, citations, research productivity, interdisciplinary communications
JEL Classification: A10, A12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kodrzycki, Yolanda K. and Yu, Pingkang David, New Approaches to Ranking Economics Journals (June 2006). FRB Boston Working Paper No. 05-12. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=834564 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.834564