Download This PaperSarbanes-Oxley after Three Years
U Illinois Law & Economics Research Paper No. LE05-016
New Zealand Law Review, 2005
19 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2005
There are 2 versions of this paper
Abstract
This article reports on the experience with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in the three years since its passage. In general, the costs have been significant and the benefits elusive. This suggests some lessons for future regulation.
JEL Classification: K20, K22, K34, K42, L51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Larry Edward Ribstein (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law (deceased)
PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By Ivy Zhang
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance
-
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: the Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules
-
Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings Management
By Haidan Li, Morton Pincus, ...
-
Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations
By Christian Leuz, Alexander J. Triantis, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Firms' Going-Private Decisions
By Ellen Engel, Rachel M. Hayes, ...
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Security Market Behavior: Early Evidence
By Zabihollah Rezaee and Pankaj K. Jain