Payout Policy, Agency Conflicts, and Corporate Governance

47 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2006

See all articles by Kose John

Kose John

New York University (NYU) - Department of Finance

Anzhela Knyazeva

Independent; New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business

Date Written: May 2006


This paper examines the role of corporate governance for payout policy design from the perspective of pre-commitment. We test the effect of external and internal corporate governance on the design of payout policy and use of pre-commitment, level and structure of cash distributions, and firm dividend and repurchase behavior.

We argue that firms use pre-commitment to dividend payments to mitigate the agency conflict due to poor governance. We argue that there is an important distinction between dividends and repurchases from the perspective of pre-commitment. Managers that deviate from the chosen dividend policy incur a cost due to a strong negative market response, which reinforces the pre-commitment role of dividends. On the other hand, the market treats share repurchases as more flexible, irregular payouts made at the manager's discretion, which makes repurchases less effective at mitigating the agency conflict. Therefore, a standalone repurchase policy is not sufficient to mitigate the governance failure, introducing the need for dividend pre-commitment as part of payout policy. Empirically, we find that weak governance is associated with a greater emphasis on dividend pre-commitment in total payout composition. Firms with weak governance are also significantly less likely to use standalone repurchase policies as opposed to a dividends - only or a mixed dividends - repurchases payout policy. Costly dividend pre-commitment presents few benefits to well-governed managers. Instead, they either store excess cash in the firm or distribute it through repurchases. We find that the type of monitoring mechanism is relevant for predicting discretionary payouts.

Given the generally strong investor protection level in the US, poorly monitored managers are not immune from firing and they will follow a costly dividend policy. Consistent with the proposed explanation, we find that firms with weak corporate governance on average pay higher dividends. The relation between dividends and governance is stronger for firms with high free cash flow.

Managers faced with a high takeover threat (external monitoring) are more likely to repurchase and tend to repurchase more on average. On the other hand, strong internal governance (board, institutional blockholder) allows more accurate following of managerial actions and is associated with fewer cash distributions of any kind, including repurchases.

Keywords: payout policy design, dividends, repurchases, pre-commitment, corporate governance, agency conflicts

JEL Classification: G30, G34, G35

Suggested Citation

John, Kose and Knyazeva, Anzhela, Payout Policy, Agency Conflicts, and Corporate Governance (May 2006). Available at SSRN: or

Kose John

New York University (NYU) - Department of Finance ( email )

Stern School of Business
44 West 4th Street
New York, NY 10012-1126
United States
212-998-0337 (Phone)
212-995-4233 (Fax)

New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business ( email )

44 West 4th Street
Suite 9-160
New York, NY NY 10012
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics