Empirically Testing Dworkin's Chain Novel Theory: Studying the Path of Precedent

64 Pages Posted: 17 Feb 2006

See all articles by Stefanie A. Lindquist

Stefanie A. Lindquist

University of Texas at Austin - School of Law

Frank B. Cross

Deceased; Deceased; Deceased


This article provides an empirical study of the effect of precedent on judicial decisionmaking. Precedent is much analyzed as a controlling factor for judicial decisions but rarely tested for its effect. Some have argued that reliance on precedent creates a system of path dependence of the law, which may yield undesirable herd behavior. As a framework for the study of precedent, we use Dworkin's metaphor of a chain novel, in which each deciding judge writes upon a background to which he or she must adhere, thereby influencing his decisions. This yields testable hypotheses about judicial decisionmaking. Given the considerable data on the ideological component of judicial decisionmaking, it provides a means to study the effect of precedent, as a constraint on judicial ideology. First, we examine cases of first impression, for which there is no controlling precedent, like the very first chapter of a chain novel. The hypothesis is that the absence of precedent in these cases frees judges to use their ideology to a greater degree than in other cases with precedents, and this hypothesis is confirmed. Judges render more ideological opinions in cases of first impression. The second study considers the growth of precedent over time in the context of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 litigation. The hypothesis is that as precedents accumulate, they steadily narrow the range of judicial discretion, so the effect of ideology should dwindle over time, as might be expected from a chain novel. The data falsify this hypothesis, as ideology seems to increase somewhat as a determinant as more precedents build up. The results suggest that precedent acts as only a limited constraint on judicial decisionmaking and the path dependence of a system of stare decisis is exaggerated.

Suggested Citation

Lindquist, Stefanie A. and Cross, Frank B., Empirically Testing Dworkin's Chain Novel Theory: Studying the Path of Precedent. New York University Law Review, Vol. 80, p. 1156, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=841507

Stefanie A. Lindquist (Contact Author)

University of Texas at Austin - School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1319 (Phone)

Frank B. Cross




Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics