Notes on the Methodology Debate in Contemporary Jurisprudence: Why Sociologists Might Be Interested
Law and Sociology, Vol. 8, pp. 254-258, May 9, 2006
5 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2005 Last revised: 31 Mar 2017
Date Written: 2006
Abstract
The current Methodology Debate in jurisprudence centers around the question whether conceptual analysis is still a viable methodology for legal theory. This article considers the impact of Quine's critique of the analytic/synthetic distinction for both the Methodology Debate in legal philosophy and the implications of the debate for sociologists of law. (this is an uncorrected page proof)
Keywords: jurisprudence, legal philosophy, legal theory, philosophy, sociology
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Patterson, Dennis, Notes on the Methodology Debate in Contemporary Jurisprudence: Why Sociologists Might Be Interested (2006). Law and Sociology, Vol. 8, pp. 254-258, May 9, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=848984
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.