American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S16-S20, 2005
5 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2005
Although the tobacco industry helped fund the attack on "junk science," it has created its own dubious scientific scholarship for its expert witnesses. We suggest that plaintiffs' counsel should be proactive in using Daubert hearings to exclude the tobacco industry defendants' scientific expert witnesses by introducing documentation, such as we have found through researching previously privileged internal industry documents, to prove that much of their proposed testimony was developed by and for their lawyers.
Keywords: Expert testimony, scientific evidence, Daubert
JEL Classification: K13, K32, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Friedman, Lissy C. and Daynard, Richard A. and Banthin, Christopher N., How Tobacco-Friendly Science Escapes Scrutiny in the Courtroom. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 95, No. S1, pp. S16-S20, 2005; The Coronado Conference: Scientific Evidence and Public Policy Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=850107