Foreign Subsidization and Excess Capacity
42 Pages Posted: 2 Mar 2006 Last revised: 28 Sep 2022
Date Written: November 2005
Abstract
The U.S. steel industry has long held that foreign subsidization and excess capacity has led to its long-run demise, yet no one has formally examined this hypothesis. In this paper, we incorporate foreign subsidization considerations into a model based on Staiger and Wolak's (1992) cyclical-dumping framework and illustrate testable implications of both cyclical excess capacity and structural excess capacity stemming from foreign subsidization. We then use detailed product- and foreign country-level data on steel exports to the U.S. market from 1979 through 2002 to estimate these excess capacity effects. The results provide strong evidence of both cyclical and structural excess capacity effects for exports to the U.S. market. However, the effects are confined to such a narrow range of country-product combinations that it is unlikely that such effects were a significant factor in the fortunes of U.S. steel firms over the past decades.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Imports as a Cause of Injury: the Case of the U.S. Steel Industry
-
The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence
By Alan Sykes
-
Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in U.S. Section 201 Cases