Honest Beliefs, Credible Lies, and Culpable Awareness: Rhetoric, Inequality, and Mens Rea in Sexual Assault

Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 625-660, 2004

36 Pages Posted: 12 Oct 2007 Last revised: 1 Aug 2011

Date Written: 2004

Abstract

The exculpatory rhetorical power of the term "honest belief" continues to invite reliance on the bare credibility of belief in consent to determine culpability in sexual assault. In law, however, only a comprehensive analysis of mens rea, including an examination of the material facts and circumstances of which the accused was aware, demonstrates whether a "belief" in consent was or was not reckless or wilfully blind. An accused's "honest belief" routinely begs this question, leading to a truncated analysis of criminal responsibility, and error. The problem illustrates how easily old rhetoric perpetuates assumptions that no longer have a place in Canadian law.

Keywords: criminal responsibility, sexual assault, consent, mens rea, recklessness, wilful blindness, legal rhetoric

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Vandervort, Lucinda, Honest Beliefs, Credible Lies, and Culpable Awareness: Rhetoric, Inequality, and Mens Rea in Sexual Assault (2004). Osgoode Hall Law Journal, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 625-660, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=863184

Lucinda Vandervort (Contact Author)

University of Saskatchewan ( email )

Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A6
Canada
(306) 966-5889 (Phone)
(306) 966-5900 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
261
Abstract Views
2,368
Rank
233,563
PlumX Metrics