Footnotes (68)



Tenure: Endangered or Evolutionary Species

James Fishman

Pace University - School of Law

Akron Law Review, Forthcoming

Advocates of tenure emphasize its contributions to professional excellence and the quest for truth. These benefits are more important than individual benefits or the costs to those who fail to gain tenure or to universities that lose their flexibility. Critics argue that tenure creates excessive social and individual costs, because unproductive tenured faculty hinders opportunities to hire new faculty or implement programmatic innovation.

This article reviews some of the challenges to the system of academic tenure: the efforts to reform, curtail or eliminate it. It will discuss exogenous factors undermining the institution, and then suggest some areas where tenure should evolve, particularly focusing upon academic tenure in legal education. The author argues that the hierarchical structure of traditionally tenured faculty and other faculty, clinicians and legal writing professors, employed on short or long-term contracts, has undermined academic freedom and tenure.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Law and Education, Law and Society

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 15, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Fishman, James, Tenure: Endangered or Evolutionary Species. Akron Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=868393

Contact Information

James Fishman (Contact Author)
Pace University - School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 898
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 233,868
Footnotes:  68