The Strategic Response by Pharmaceutical Firms to the Medicaid Most-Favored-Customer Rules

RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1997

Posted: 25 Jun 1997

See all articles by Fiona M. Scott Morton

Fiona M. Scott Morton

Yale School of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

In 1991 a most-favored-customer (MFC) rule was adopted to govern pharmaceutical prices paid by Medicaid. Theoretical models show that an MFC rule commits a firm to compete less aggressively in prices. I find that the price of branded products facing generic competition rose (4% on average). Brands protected by patents did not significantly increase in price. Generics in concentrated markets should display a strategic response to the brand's adoption of the MFC; I find that generic firms raise price more as their markets become concentrated. Hospital prices show little change. The results suggest that the MFC rule caused higher prices for some pharmaceutical customers.

JEL Classification: L10, L15, L65

Suggested Citation

Scott Morton, Fiona M., The Strategic Response by Pharmaceutical Firms to the Medicaid Most-Favored-Customer Rules. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1997, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=8699

Fiona M. Scott Morton (Contact Author)

Yale School of Management ( email )

493 College St
New Haven, CT CT 06520
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
2,065
PlumX Metrics