The Paradox of Legal Harmonization
43 Pages Posted: 16 Dec 2005
Abstract
The legal landscape is changing, adapting to the global market. Differences between legal systems hinder transnational commerce. Countries reduce legal differences through non-cooperative and cooperative adaptation processes that alternatively lead to legal transplantation or harmonization. Switching costs render unification difficult. Cooperation reduces differences to a greater extent but rarely leads to legal unification. In this paper we unveil a paradox of legal harmonization. When switching costs are endogenous, countries engaging in cooperative harmonization may end up with less harmonization than those pursuing non-cooperative strategies.
Keywords: legal harmonization, legal transplantation, transnational contracts, legal change
JEL Classification: K10, K33, D70
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Treaty Reservations and the Economics of Article 21 (1) of the Vienna Convention
-
Reciprocity-Induced Cooperation
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
The Emergence and Evolution of Customary International Law
By Francesco Parisi and Daniel Pi
-
The Role of Reciprocity in International Law
By Francesco Parisi and Nita Ghei
-
Stability and Change in International Customary Law
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
International Customary Law and Articulation Theories: an Economic Analysis
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
The Hidden Bias of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi
-
The Economic Structure of the Law of International Organizations
-
By Vincy Fon and Francesco Parisi