Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View

70 Pages Posted: 28 Dec 2005 Last revised: 17 Dec 2021

See all articles by Jenia Iontcheva Turner

Jenia Iontcheva Turner

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

Current rules in most U.S. jurisdictions prohibit judges from becoming involved in plea negotiations and limit the judges' role to reviewing a plea bargain once it is presented by the parties. The enclosed article surveys three systems that provide for more significant judicial involvement - Germany, Florida, and Connecticut - and suggests that a judge's early input into plea negotiations can render the final disposition more accurate and procedurally just. Based on interviews with practitioners and a review of the case law, the article outlines a model for greater judicial involvement in plea negotiations.

Keywords: plea bargaining, plea negotiations, judges, criminal procedure, comparative

JEL Classification: K00, K14, K33, K40, K42

Suggested Citation

Turner, Jenia Iontcheva, Judicial Participation in Plea Negotiations: A Comparative View (2006). 54 American Journal of Comparative Law 199 (2006), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=871979

Jenia Iontcheva Turner (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
4,874
PlumX Metrics