The Political Economy of Revenue-Forecasting Experience from Low-Income Countries
31 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2006
Date Written: January 2005
Abstract
This paper analyzes interference and timeliness in the revenue-forecasting process, using new data on revenue-forecasting practices in low-income countries. Interference is defined as the occurrence of a significant deviation from purely technical forecasts. A theoretical model explains forecasting interference through government corruption. The data broadly supports the model, and the results are robust to alternative explanations. The paper also constructs three indices - transparency, formality, and organizational simplicity - that characterize revenue-forecasting practices, and assesses their effectiveness in producing an upfront - that is, timely - budget envelope. More transparent and simple forecasting processes lead to early budget constraints, while formality has no measurable effect.
Keywords: revenue forecasting, corruption, forecasting bias
JEL Classification: H20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
How Accurate are the Imf's Short-Term Forecasts? Another Examination of the World Economic Outlook
-
Comparing Projections and Outcomes of Imf-Supported Programs
By Alberto Musso and Steven Phillips
-
Comparing Projections and Outcomes of Imf-Supported Programs
By Alberto Musso and Steven Phillips
-
Systemic Weaknesses of Budget Management in Anglophone Africa
By Ian Lienert and Feridoun Sarraf
-
By Philipp Ager, Marcus Kappler, ...
-
Defining and Improving the Accuracy of Macroeconomic Forecasts: Contributions from a VAR Model
By Roy H. Webb and William Lupoletti