Women in the Workplace: Which Women, Which Agenda?

38 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2006

See all articles by Michael Selmi

Michael Selmi

George Washington University Law School

Naomi Cahn

George Washington University - Law School

Abstract

Much of the work family literature that has blossomed over the last decade has focused on professional women and has emphasized policy changes that would be of less utility to many other working women and men. In this symposium contribution, we explore the recent data on working time to demonstrate that in today's economy more women are underemployed rather than overemployed. We also demonstrate that although professional women tend to work the longest hours, they also tend to have the greatest means, both in income and workplace benefits, to support them in achieving a workable balance between their work and family demands. We discuss the most prominent policy proposals for helping attain this balance, including a greater emphasis on part-time work and shorter workweeks, and critique them for their failure to address the needs of most working women. Finally, we suggest several alternative proposals, including lengthening school days, addressing domestic violence, and challenging the stubborn gender norms that prevent further progress for equality in both the workplace and the home.

Suggested Citation

Selmi, Michael L. and Cahn, Naomi R., Women in the Workplace: Which Women, Which Agenda?. Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 13, Spring 2006 (Symposium Issue); George Washington University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 181. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=873876

Michael L. Selmi (Contact Author)

George Washington University Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-1550 (Phone)

Naomi R. Cahn

George Washington University - Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-6025 (Phone)
202-994-5614 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
251
Abstract Views
2,456
rank
120,217
PlumX Metrics