The Clark Model with Correlated Components
48 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2006
Date Written: January 16, 2006
Abstract
This paper is an extension of "Why are the Beveridge-Nelson and Unobserved-Components Decompositions of GDP so Different?" (Morley, Nelson, and Zivot, 2003) to Clark's double-drift unobserved components model. We show that the reduced-form of the double-drift model is an ARIMA(2,2,3) model, and we discuss various restrictions for identifying the parameters of the double-drift model with correlated components. When shocks to the smooth trend and cycle are allowed to be correlated but forced to be uncorrelated with shocks to the drift, the Kalman Filter estimates of the trend and cycle are identical to the estimates from the Beveridge-Nelson decomposition from the ARIMA(2,2,3) model and are similar to the estimates from Morley, Nelson and Zivot. We also find that alternative identification schemes are not supported by the data.
Keywords: Beveridge-Nelson Decomposition, identification, Trend-Cycle Decomposition, Unobserved Components Model
JEL Classification: C22, E32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Measuring the NAIRU with Reduced Uncertainty: A Multiple Indicator-Common Component Approach
By Arabinda Basistha and Richard Startz
-
In Search of the Natural Rate of Unemployment
By Thomas B. King and James Morley
-
Capacity Utilisation, Constraints and Price Adjustments Under the Microscope
By Sarah M. Lein and Eva M. Kberl
-
Output Fluctuations in the G-7: An Unobserved Components Approach
By Sinchan Mitra and Tara M. Sinclair
-
Testing Stationarity with Unobserved Components Models
By James Morley, Irina Panovska, ...
-
A Review of Cyclical Indicators for the United States: Preliminary Results
-
Demand Variability, Supply Shocks and the Output-Inflation Tradeoff
By Richard T. Froyen and Roger N. Waud
-
The NAICU and the Phillips Curve - An Approach Based on Micro Data
By Eva M. Kberl and Sarah M. Lein