Monetary Policy Arithmetic: Reconciling Theory with Evidence
27 Pages Posted: 8 May 2006
Abstract
Empirical evidence indicates that, in countries with low inflation rates, a permanent decrease in inflation rate either has no impact on capital stock and output (superneutrality) or causes them to fall moderately. Existing budget arithmetic models of monetary policy cannot deliver superneutrality. In this paper, we conduct a budget arithmetic analysis of monetary policy using a money demand specification - money in the utility function - that is new to this literature. We find that one simple assumption about utility from money delivers superneutrality, while a more general assumption delivers departures from superneutrality in the direction consistent with the evidence.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Inflation and the Great Ratios: Long-Term Evidence from the U.S.
By Shaghil Ahmed and John H. Rogers
-
Dynamic Behavior of Capital Accumulation in a Cash-in-Advance Model
-
Optimal Monetary Policy and Economic Growth
By Joydeep Bhattacharya, Joseph Haslag, ...
-
The Demand for Bank Reserves and Other Monetary Aggregates
By Max Gillman and Michal Kejak
-
Contrasting Models of the Effect of Inflation on Growth
By Max Gillman and Michal Kejak
-
By Max Gillman and Anton Nakov
-
Price Liberalization, Money Growth, and Inflation During the Transition to a Market Economy
-
Granger Causality of the Inflation - Growth Mirror in Accession Countries
By Max Gillman and Anton Nakov
-
Granger Causality of the Inflation-Growth Mirror in Accession Countries
By Max Gillman and Anton Nakov
Monetary Policy Arithmetic: Reconciling Theory with Evidence
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $42.00 .
File name: caje.pdf
Size: 208K
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.
