Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 83-111, Autumn 2006
29 Pages Posted: 21 Oct 2006
A federal court recently held that discrimination against transsexuals is illegal sex discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The linchpin of the ruling is the legal concept of sex stereotyping. Feminist legal theorists have celebrated cases protecting gender non-conformists from discrimination and harassment, but we have not yet fully evaluated what we get when we get legal protections based on stereotyping. How does the concept of the illegal sex stereotype govern sex discrimination law? What does it mean to enfold transgender discrimination into sex discrimination law without naming and describing it separately? Perhaps law can be used merely instrumentally, and so any route to a winning verdict is acceptable. But if law is constitutive of identities in important ways, perhaps even as it is also instrumental, then calling transgender discrimination sex discrimination will have significant consequences. This study takes stock of those political and legal implications, arguing that although the winning case is worth celebrating, it depends upon an untrustworthy jurisprudence.
Keywords: sex discrimination, transgender discrimination, sex stereotyping, Title VII
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Kirkland, Anna R., What's at Stake in Transgender Discrimination as Sex Discrimination?. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 83-111, Autumn 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=877479