Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause

4 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2006

See all articles by Peter Tillers

Peter Tillers

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

Judges can neither do good legal history nor recognize good legal history. Q.E.D.

Keywords: Confrontation Clause, Legal History, Misuse of Legal History

Suggested Citation

Tillers, Peter, Legal History for a Dummy: A Comment on the Role of History in Judicial Interpretation of the Confrontation Clause. Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 235, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=879272 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.693862

Peter Tillers (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0334 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
644
Rank
165,542
PlumX Metrics