Vivat, Cvat and All that: New Forms of Value-Added Tax for Federal Systems
20 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2006
Date Written: April 2000
Abstract
Conventional wisdom has it that the value-added tax is not a suitable instrument for lower-level jurisdictions ('provinces') in a federal system. The problems that arise when it is so used have become a serious constraint on the development of the VAT - and closer economic integration - in Brazil, the EU, India and elsewhere. This paper describes and compares two recent proposals for forms of VAT intended to alleviate these difficulties: the VIVAT and the CVAT. Both enable the VAT chain to be preserved on inter-provincial trade without compromising the destination principle (allowing provinces to tax consumption at different rates) or introducing new scope for game-playing by the provinces. The key difference between them is that the CVAT requires sellers to discriminate between buyers located in different provinces of the federation, whereas VIVAT requires them to discriminate between registered and non-registered buyers. Where the balance of advantage between the two lies is not entirely obvious.
Keywords: Value added tax, Fiscal Federalism
JEL Classification: H20, H71
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Pareto Efficiency in International Taxation
By David E. Wildasin and Michael Keen
-
The Whys and Why Nots of Export Taxation
By Shantayanan Devarajan, Delfin S. Go, ...
-
Promoting Better Logging Practices in Tropical Forests
By Marco Boscolo and Jeffrey R. Vincent
-
By Giorgio Brosio and Ehtisham Ahmad
-
Optimal Export Taxes in a Multicountry Framework
By Kamil Yilmaz
-
Coordinating Vats between EU Member States
By Bernd Genser
-
Distortionary Domestic Taxation and Pareto-Efficient International Trade
By Jeremy Edwards and Ronnie Schöb
-
Economic and Environmental Benefits of Eliminating Log Export Bans the Case of Costa Rica
By Nalin Kishor, Muthukumara Mani, ...