Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

R If C > P + B: A Paradigm for Judicial Remedies of Socio-Economic Rights Violations

South African Journal on Human Rights, Vol. 18, p. 161, 2002

40 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2007 Last revised: 25 Oct 2007

Thomas J. Bollyky

Council on Foreign Relations

Abstract

There is no rights apartheid. Socioeconomic rights are subject to enforcement in the same manner as civil rights. If a remedy requires extensive - quantitatively and qualitatively - policy and budgetary choices, the court will only make them for a constitutional violation which is proportionately - quantitatively or qualitatively - extensive. This dynamic may be described algebraically as R if C > B + P. The predictive utility of this paradigm is somewhat reduced by the difficulty of defining with precision the contextual aspects of these variables - the historical, political, and moral forces at work. As a rough approximation of judicial decisions regarding remedies, this paradigm suggests that Treatment Action Campaign and Others v. Minister of Health and Others will be the first socioeconomic case to break down the perceived rights apartheid. The article concludes, however, that the better use of this paradigm may be as an instrument for the design of litigation regarding socioeconomic rights.

Keywords: South Africa, socioeconomic, constitutional, judicial remedies

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Bollyky, Thomas J., R If C > P + B: A Paradigm for Judicial Remedies of Socio-Economic Rights Violations. South African Journal on Human Rights, Vol. 18, p. 161, 2002. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=881267

Thomas J. Bollyky (Contact Author)

Council on Foreign Relations ( email )

1777 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Rank
282,042
Abstract Views
903