Why are Well-Educated Women Not Full-Timers?
45 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2006
Date Written: February 2006
Abstract
A priori, one would expect that well educated women would choose to work fulltime to collect the returns to their investment in education. However, that is not the case. We analyze this phenomenon in a discrete choice dynamic programming framework, taking the potentially endogenous effect of work experience on annual earnings into account. We find that the main explanations are flat experience profiles and a high disutility of work. Policy simulations reveal that a moderate change in the return to experience or a moderate reduction in unemployment benefits would increase the proportion of full-timers substantially.
Keywords: high-educated women, labour force participation, disutility of work, discrete
JEL Classification: D1, D91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Jacob Mincer and Haim Ofek
-
Sex-Related Wage Differentials and Women's Interrupted Labor Careers--The Chicken or the Egg
-
Does the Gap in Family-Friendly Policies Drive the Family Gap?
By Helena Skyt Nielsen, Marianne Simonsen, ...
-
The Timing of Careers and Human Capital Depreciation
By Astrid Kunze
-
Gender Differences in Entry Wages and Early Career Wages
By Astrid Kunze
-
Career Plans and Expectations of Young Women and Men: the Earnings Gap and Labor Force Participation
-
His and Hers: Gender Differences in Work and Income, 1959-1979