Annals of the Society for the History of Economic Thought, , Vol. 43, pp. 1-10, June 2003
10 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2006 Last revised: 27 Feb 2012
We argue that in the 20th century economic theory took a path that purged human actors from economic analysis. We describe this evolution as the result of four competing visions in economics: the analytic narrative approach pursued by the classical economists, New Institutional Economics, and Austrian economics, the approach of the old institutional economics, the approach of modern neoclassical economics, and an approach that blended neoclassical economics with a particular form of game theory, which we call formalistic historicism. We contend that only the first of these visions is consistent with acting man as the center of economic analysis. Movement back to human-centered economics requires a return to this vision.
Keywords: A14, B20, B52, B53
JEL Classification: Evolution of Economics, Methodology, Praxeology
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Boettke, Peter J. and Coyne, Christopher J. and Leeson, Peter T., Man as Machine: The Plight of 20th Century Economics. Annals of the Society for the History of Economic Thought, , Vol. 43, pp. 1-10, June 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=881780