Macroeconomic Conditions and Pressures for Protection Under Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws: Empirical Evidence from the United States
24 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2006
Date Written: August 1996
Abstract
Antidumping and countervailing duty procedures are governed by specific rules requiring both injury (by reason of imports) and dumping/subsidies, and thus might be expected to be less susceptible to pressures for protection arising from cyclical movements in the domestic macroeconomy. This paper investigates whether there is a connection between the state of domestic macroeconomic activity and pressures for protection under antidumping and countervailing duties. The evidence suggests that pressures for protection under these measures since the Tokyo Round of multilateral trade talks have advanced during periods of macroeconomic weakness and receded during periods of macroeconomic strength.
JEL Classification: F1, F4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping
By Thomas Prusa
-
Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States
By Robert W. Staiger and Frank Wolak
-
Cumulation and Itc Decision-Making: The Sum of the Parts is Greater Thanthe Whole
By Wendy L. Hansen and Thomas Prusa
-
The Trade Effects of U.S. Antidumping Actions
By Thomas Prusa
-
The Effect of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Foreign Monopoly
By Robert W. Staiger and Frank Wolak
-
Strategic Use of Antidumping Law to Enforce Tacit International Collusion
By Robert W. Staiger and Frank Wolak
-
European Anti-Dumping Policy and the Profitability of National and International Collusion
-
Import Diversion Under European Antidumping Policy
By Hylke Vandenbussche, Jozef Konings, ...
-
Import Diversion Under European Antidumping Policy
By Jozef Konings, Linda Springael, ...
-
Free Trade and Deep Integration: Antidumping and Antitrust in Regional Agreements