Do Imf-Supported Programs Work? A Survey of the Cross-Country Empirical Evidence
28 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2006
Date Written: December 1998
Over the last two decades a number of cross-country empirical studies have been undertaken to assess whether IMF-supported adjustment programs have led to an improved balance of payments and current account balance, lower inflation, and higher growth. These studies use a variety of methodologies and cover different country samples and time periods. This paper critically surveys the evidence yielded by the cross-country studies, paying special attention to the pros and cons of the respective empirical methodologies employed. These studies, particularly the more recent ones, conclude that IMF-supported programs have generally been successful in stabilizing the economy.
Keywords: IMF programs, cross-country studies, program evaluation
JEL Classification: E63, F34, F41, O19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
IMF Programs: Who is Chosen and What are the Effects?
By Robert J. Barro and Jong-wha Lee
Economic Determinants of Fund Financial Arrangements
By Malcolm Knight and Julio A. Santaella
The IMF Approach to Economic Stabilization
International Bailouts, Moral Hazard, and Conditionality
Does IMF Financing Result in Moral Hazard?
By Timothy Lane and Steven Phillips
Does the IMF Cause Moral Hazard and Political Business Cycles? Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher and Roland Vaubel
The Macroeconomic Effects of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs: An Empirical Assessment
Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach
By Allan Drazen
Debt Relief for Low-Income Countries and the Hipc Initiative
By Anthony Boote and Kamau Thugge