Do Imf-Supported Programs Work? A Survey of the Cross-Country Empirical Evidence
28 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2006
Date Written: December 1998
Abstract
Over the last two decades a number of cross-country empirical studies have been undertaken to assess whether IMF-supported adjustment programs have led to an improved balance of payments and current account balance, lower inflation, and higher growth. These studies use a variety of methodologies and cover different country samples and time periods. This paper critically surveys the evidence yielded by the cross-country studies, paying special attention to the pros and cons of the respective empirical methodologies employed. These studies, particularly the more recent ones, conclude that IMF-supported programs have generally been successful in stabilizing the economy.
Keywords: IMF programs, cross-country studies, program evaluation
JEL Classification: E63, F34, F41, O19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
IMF Programs: Who is Chosen and What are the Effects?
By Robert J. Barro and Jong-wha Lee
-
Economic Determinants of Fund Financial Arrangements
By Malcolm Knight and Julio A. Santaella
-
Does IMF Financing Result in Moral Hazard?
By Timothy Lane and Steven Phillips
-
Does the IMF Cause Moral Hazard and Political Business Cycles? Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher and Roland Vaubel
-
The Macroeconomic Effects of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs: An Empirical Assessment
-
Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach
By Allan Drazen
-
Debt Relief for Low-Income Countries and the Hipc Initiative
By Anthony Boote and Kamau Thugge