Durable Goods and Conformity
49 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2006 Last revised: 15 May 2022
Date Written: February 2006
Abstract
Is the variety of products supplied in markets a reflection of the diversity of consumers' preferences? In this paper, we argue that the distribution of durable goods offered in markets tends to be compressed relative to the distribution of consumers' underlying preferences. In particular, there are strong incentives for conformity in markets for durable goods. The reason for conformity is natural: durables (for example houses) are traded and as a result, demand for these goods is influenced by their resale value. Agents may like one product, but purchase another because of resale concerns. We show that (1) there is a tendency to conform to the average preference; (2) conformity depends primarily on the number of people with extreme preferences; (3) conformity increases with increases in durability, patience, and the likelihood of trade; and (4) equilibrium conformity is not necessarily optimal. Surprisingly, there tends to be too little conformity in equilibrium. Conformity also creates a demand for rental markets. Renting does not necessarily decrease conformity however. Instead, renting tends to exaggerate conformity in the owner-occupied market.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Adverse Selection in Durable Goods Markets
By Igal Hendel and Alessandro Lizzeri
-
The Role of Leasing Under Adverse Selection
By Igal Hendel and Alessandro Lizzeri
-
Patterns of Trade in the Market for Used Durables: Theory and Evidence
By Robert H. Porter and Peter Sattler
-
Leasing, Lemons, and Moral Hazard
By Michael Waldman and Justin Johnson
-
The Market for Used Cars: New Evidence of the Lemons Phenomenon
By Winand Emons and George Sheldon
-
The Market for Used Cars: A New Test of the Lemons Model
By Winand Emons and George Sheldon
-
Waiting for News in the Market for Lemons
By Brendan Daley and Brett Green
-
Competitive Planned Obsolescence
By Paul A. Grout and In-uck Park