Sorting, Prices, and Social Preferences
56 Pages Posted: 4 May 2006 Last revised: 27 Nov 2022
Date Written: February 2006
Abstract
What impact do social preferences have in market-type settings where individuals can sort in response to relative prices? We show that sorting behavior can distinguish between individuals who like to share and those who share but prefer to avoid the sharing environment altogether. In four laboratory experiments, prices and social preferences interact to determine the composition of sharing environments: Costless sorting reduces the number of sharers, even after inducing positive reciprocity. Subsidized sharing increases entry, but mainly by the least generous sharers. Costly sharing reduces entry, but attracts those who share generously. We discuss implications for real-world giving with sorting.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Glenn W. Harrison and John A. List
-
Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
By John A. List
-
The Origin of the Winner's Curse: A Laboratory Study
By Gary Charness and Dan Levin
-
Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods
-
Friend or Foe? A Natural Experiment of the Prisoner's Dilemma
By John A. List
-
Naturally Occurring Markets and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of the Winner's Curse
By Glenn W. Harrison and John A. List
-
Risk Attitudes, Randomization to Treatment, and Self-Selection into Experiments
By Glenn W. Harrison, Morten I. Lau, ...
-
Overconfidence vs. Market Efficiency in the National Football League
By Cade Massey and Richard H. Thaler