Argentina's Pathway Through Financial Crisis
Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Papers No. 016
GEG Working Paper No. 2004/02
26 Pages Posted: 15 Feb 2006
Date Written: September 12, 2005
Abstract
Political support for Argentina's currency board rested on distributing the early gains from ending hyper-inflation and the spending made possible with access to external credit. When these gains were exhausted and external shocks left the peso overvalued, neither Argentina's political system nor its economy could adjust. The needed adjustment went well beyond simple fiscal tightening: it required deciding who would incur the financial losses associated with the deep contraction needed to correct a real over-valuation in a heavily indebted economy. By 2000, Argentina faced the prospect of further economic contraction, a banking crisis and an external sovereign debt crisis. Even if none of the three crises was avoidable, preemptive action might have made one or more of them less severe. Yet preemption was a political orphan - no political constituency in Argentina argued to bring some pain forward for a chance of less pain down the road, and the IMF and G-7 preferred continued financing to the political risk of supporting a new macroeconomic strategy.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Justice Without Borders: Prosecuting General Pinochet
By Nehal Bhuta
-
Globalisation and the 'Paradox of State Power': Perspectives from Latin America
-
The Concept of 'Crisis': What Can We Learn from the Two Dictatorships of L. Quinctius Cincinnatus?
By Oren Gross
-
A Catastrophe Foretold: Economic Reform, Crisis, Recovery and Employment in Argentina
-
The Myth of American Exceptionalism and the Tragedy of Neoconservative Foreign Policy
-
The Clash of Commitments at the International Criminal Court
By Tom Ginsburg
-
Fighting Piracy in Somalia (and Elsewhere): Why More is Needed