Wagering on Religious Freedom

Nathan B. Oman

William & Mary Law School

Harvard Law Review, Vol. 116, No. 3, p. 946, 2003

Why is religious freedom valuable? This is a basic question necessarily presupposed in any discussion of the free exercise clause or other legal protections for freedom of religion. In this paper, I argue that at present American jurisprudence lacks a coherent theory of religious freedom. In the beginning, the arguments for religious liberty were cast in explicitly theological terms. In a pluralistic age, however, these theological arguments lack any real traction. Using Pascal's wager as an analogy, however, it is possible to recast the theological justification for religious freedom in terms suitable for a pluralistic society. Indeed, the argument can be formalized into a simple economic claim: religious liberty is Kaldor-Hicks efficient.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: Law & Economics, Law & Religion, Religious Freedom, Pascal

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 1, 2006  

Suggested Citation

Oman, Nathan B., Wagering on Religious Freedom. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 116, No. 3, p. 946, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=886096

Contact Information

Nathan B. Oman (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
HOME PAGE: http://nboman.people.wm.edu
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,209
Downloads: 114
Download Rank: 190,690