Is Public Ownership Bad for Professional Service Firms? Ad Agency Ownership, Performance, and Creativity
Academy of Management Journal, Forthcoming
43 Pages Posted: 2 Mar 2006
Abstract
Does public ownership have negative consequences for professional service firms by reducing employee incentives? I address this question with a panel of advertising agencies. Public ownership was associated with inferior performance for small agencies but not for large agencies; and there was no association between ownership and agency creativity, indicating that public ownership did not preclude agencies from competing with strategies requiring highly-skilled professionals. The results challenge existing theories of the ownership models of professional service firms.
Keywords: professional services, ownership, public ownership, going public, creativity, advertising
JEL Classification: D21, L84, G32, L22, M21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Firms, Courts, and Reputation Mechanisms: Towards a Positive Theory of Private Ordering
-
Authority and Commitment: Why Universities, Like Legislatures, are Not Organized as Firms
-
The Questionable Empirical Basis of Article 2's Incorporation Strategy: A Preliminary Study
-
Faculty Turnover at American Colleges and Universities: Analysis of Aaup Data
By Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Hirschel Kasper, ...
-
What is a Professional Service Firm? Towards a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge Intensive Firms
-
Rules Transparency and Political Accountability
By Massimo Bordignon and Enrico Minelli
-
From St. Ives to Cyberspace: The Modern Distortion of the Medieval 'Law Merchant'
-
A Theory of Organizational Dynamics: Internal Politics and Efficiency
By Hongbin Cai and Hong Feng