A Critical Comparison between Australian and Canadian Creditor Protection Regimes: Voluntary Administration and Ccaa

38 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2006

See all articles by Brian M Hunt

Brian M Hunt

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Rish Handa

Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Centre for Commercial Law Studies; McGill University - Institute of Comparative Law

Date Written: June 2005

Abstract

This article compares Canadian and Australian corporate insolvency regimes. The principles and application of the Canadian Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) and Australian Voluntary Administration (VA) are critically examined in light of the other's strengths and weaknesses. Extensive comparisons with regards to corporate insolvency have been made between these countries and major economies such as Great Britain and the United States, but there is limited literature directly comparing Australia with Canada. Comparisons with economically eminent nations can help provide indicators of successful principles, however, the broad and concise similarities between Canada and Australia produce a particularly valuable comparison because of the specific points upon which applicable recommendations can arise. While the CCAA lacks some of the statutory controls of VA, particularly with respect to the liability of the supervisory 'monitor' role, VA is more rigid, which may hamper the restructuring of larger complex corporations. Both countries have ambiguities: CCAA exists alongside the Business Insolvency Act, an alternative creditor protection regime in Canada; VA caters to two discrete but simultaneous objectives: returning to solvency and maximizing return to creditors. Finally, Canada has accepted a debtor-in-possession model similar to that of the United States, whereas Australia has pointedly rejected such a model, requiring an immediate appointment of an external administrator. The authors show that there are clear and substantial benefits to both countries' regimes and that each country can learn and benefit from the experiences of the other.

Keywords: insolvency, bankruptcy, restructuring, corporate restructuring, monitor, voluntary administration, creditor protection, Canada, Australia, CCAA, VA

JEL Classification: K20, K22, K29

Suggested Citation

Hunt, Brian M. and Handa, Rish, A Critical Comparison between Australian and Canadian Creditor Protection Regimes: Voluntary Administration and Ccaa (June 2005). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=888411 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.888411

Brian M. Hunt (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Rish Handa

Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Centre for Commercial Law Studies ( email )

Charterhouse Square
London, EC1M 6AX
United Kingdom

McGill University - Institute of Comparative Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
335
Abstract Views
2,118
rank
90,943
PlumX Metrics