Capital Ratios as Predictors of Bank Failure
20 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2006
Abstract
The current review of the 1988 Basel Capital Accord has put the spotlight on the ratios used to assess banks' capital adequacy. This article examines the effectiveness of three capital ratios - the first based on leverage, the second on gross revenues, and the third on risk-weighted assets - in forecasting bank failure over different time frames. Using 1988-93 data on U.S. banks, the authors find that the simple leverage and gross revenue ratios perform as well as the more complex risk-weighted ratio over one- or two-year horizons. Although the risk-weighted measures prove more accurate in predicting bank failure over longer horizons, the simple ratios are less costly to implement and could function as useful supplementary indicators of capital adequacy.
Keywords: bank regulation, capital requirements, Basel Accord, bank failures
JEL Classification: G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Banks with Something to Lose: The Disciplinary Role of Franchise Value
By Rebecca S. Demsetz, Marc R. Saidenberg, ...
-
Are Banks Dead? Or are the Reports Greatly Exaggerated?
By John H. Boyd and Mark Gertler
-
The Decline of Traditional Banking: Implications for Financial Stabilityand Regulatory Policy
-
The Decline of Traditional Banking: Implications for Financial Stability and Regulatory Policy
-
Product Mix and Earnings Volatility at Commercial Banks: Evidence from a Degree of Leverage Model
By Robert Deyoung and Karin P. Roland
-
U.S. Commercial Banking: Trends, Cycles, and Policy
By John H. Boyd and Mark Gertler