Pinchot, Property Rights, and Western Water: A Reply to Greg Hobbs

5 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2006

Abstract

This is a brief reply to a debate between Greg Hobbs (now a justice of the Colorado Supreme Court) on water law reform. The reply claims that Hobbs' mischaracterized the Long's Peak recommendations (the product of a group of some 30 national experts) and erroneously invoked the legacy of Gifford Pinchot.

The reply explains that Pinchot's concept of multiple use was not simply a call for development of water resources but a prescription for a federal anti-monopoly role. The reply also emphasizes that nuisance law cabins water rights, that there is an appropriate federal role in streamflow protection, and argues that Pinchot would endorse both propositions.

Keywords: water law, natural resources law

JEL Classification: K12, K32

Suggested Citation

Blumm, Michael C., Pinchot, Property Rights, and Western Water: A Reply to Greg Hobbs. Environmental Law, Vol. 24, pp. 1203-1207, 1994. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=889240

Michael C. Blumm (Contact Author)

Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )

10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
503-768-6824 (Phone)
503-768-6701 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
42
Abstract Views
871
PlumX Metrics