Citations (1)


Footnotes (326)



The Dutch Auction Myth

Peter B. Oh

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

May 24, 2011

Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 42, p. 853, 2007

The bursting of the internet bubble continues to have ripple effects on the initial public offering (IPO) process. Critics of this process have fashioned a complex set of interconnected objections to the orthodox bookbuilding method for conducting IPOs, pricing shares, and allocating them to preferred investors. Critics instead hail online reverse-bid, or Dutch, auctions (Dutch IPOs) as an alternative method promising more equitable access, efficient prices, and egalitarian allocations.

This article comprehensively assesses the case for Dutch IPOs. Part I dissects critiques of bookbuilding, which rely on anomalous data, derogate established financial literature, and largely evaporate in the face of recent regulations. Part II examines the empirical performance of Dutch IPOs, which have failed to distinguish themselves in the United States and around the world. Part III reveals ways in which Dutch IPOs may be susceptible to fraud and manipulation that bookbuilding is not. Ultimately, claims of the Dutch IPO's superiority over bookbuilding are unproven at best and at worst fail to appreciate certain risks.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: asymmetrical information, auctions, bidding rings, bookbuilding, Dutch IPO, Mise en Vente, OpenIPO, spinning, securities, strategic behavior, underpricing

JEL Classification: C70, D21, D44, D82, E22, G24, K22, K42, M14

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 13, 2006 ; Last revised: May 26, 2011

Suggested Citation

Oh, Peter B., The Dutch Auction Myth (May 24, 2011). Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 42, p. 853, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=890127

Contact Information

Peter B. Oh (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15260-6900
United States
412.648.1101 (Phone)
412.648.2648 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.pitt.edu/people/peter-b-oh

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,361
Downloads: 634
Download Rank: 31,290
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  326