Purchasing Ipos with Commissions
65 Pages Posted: 15 Mar 2006 Last revised: 6 May 2011
Date Written: February 22, 2010
Abstract
Using a proprietary database of institutional trades, we find direct evidence that institutions churn stocks, increase the average commission per share they pay, and pay unusually high commissions on some trades in order to send abnormally high commissions to lead underwriters of upcoming profitable IPOs. We show that these excess commission payments are a particularly effective way for transient investors to receive lucrative IPO allocations, and that the presence of abnormal commission payments is related to underwriter characteristics, including the concentration of the underwriter’s client base. Our results suggest that the underwriter’s concern for their long-term client relationships limits the payment-for-IPO practice. We estimate that abnormal commission payments are large for the most profitable issues, and that an additional $1 excess commission payment to the lead underwriter results in $2.21 in investor profits from allocated shares.
JEL Classification: G14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
By Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
By Ivo Welch and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos: Theory and Evidence
-
Common Stock Offerings Across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence
By Hyuk Choe, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert