Friend or Foe? A Natural Experiment of the Prisoner's Dilemma
26 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2006 Last revised: 26 Dec 2022
Date Written: March 2006
Abstract
This study examines data drawn from the game show Friend or Foe?, which is similar to the classic prisoner's dilemma tale: partnerships are endogenously determined, players work together to earn money, after which, they play a one-shot prisoner's dilemma game over large stakes: varying from $200 to (potentially) more than $22,000. If one were to conduct such an experiment in the laboratory, the cost to gather the data would be well over $350,000. The data reveal several interesting insights; perhaps most provocatively, they suggest that even though the game is played in front of an audience of millions of viewers, there is some evidence consistent with a model of discrimination. The observed patterns of social discrimination are unanticipated, however. For example, there is evidence consistent with the notion that certain populations have a general "distaste" for older participants.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Glenn W. Harrison and John A. List
-
Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
By John A. List
-
Sorting, Prices, and Social Preferences
By Edward P. Lazear, Roberto A. Weber, ...
-
The Origin of the Winner's Curse: A Laboratory Study
By Gary Charness and Dan Levin
-
Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods
-
Naturally Occurring Markets and Exogenous Laboratory Experiments: A Case Study of the Winner's Curse
By Glenn W. Harrison and John A. List
-
Risk Attitudes, Randomization to Treatment, and Self-Selection into Experiments
By Glenn W. Harrison, Morten I. Lau, ...
-
Overconfidence vs. Market Efficiency in the National Football League
By Cade Massey and Richard H. Thaler