Lawyers' Bargaining Ethics, Contract, and Collaboration: The End of the Legal Profession and the Beginning of Professional Pluralism

60 Pages Posted: 27 Mar 2006

See all articles by Scott R. Peppet

Scott R. Peppet

University of Colorado Law School

Abstract

This Article combines contractarian economics and traditional ethical theory to argue for a revision of the legal profession's codes of ethics. That revision would replace the existing uniform conception of the lawyer's role with a more heterogeneous profession in which lawyers and clients could contractually choose the ethical obligations under which they wanted to operate. This contract model of legal ethics, in which lawyers could opt in and out of various ethical constraints, would lead to greater efficiencies and greater satisfaction for attorneys and clients. In particular, the paper explores the bargainer's problem of sorting honest collaborators from dishonest adversaries, and concludes that the legal ethics codes should be revised to facilitate self-identification by collaborative attorneys.

Keywords: legal ethics, contracts, bargaining, legal profession

Suggested Citation

Peppet, Scott R., Lawyers' Bargaining Ethics, Contract, and Collaboration: The End of the Legal Profession and the Beginning of Professional Pluralism. Iowa Law Review, Vol. 90, p. 475, 2005, U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=893207

Scott R. Peppet (Contact Author)

University of Colorado Law School ( email )

401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
169
Abstract Views
1,461
Rank
319,049
PlumX Metrics