The Impact of Insurance Prices on Decision-Making Biases: An Experimental Analysis
20 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2006
Date Written: August 2002
Abstract
This paper tests whether the use of endogenous risk categorization by insurers enables consumers to make better-informed decisions even if they do not choose to purchase insurance. We do so by adding a simple insurance market to an experimental test of optimal (Bayesian) updating. In some sessions, no insurance is offered. In others, actuarially fair insurance prices are posted, and a subset of subjects is allowed to purchase this insurance. We find significant differences in the decision rules used depending on whether or not one observes insurance prices. Although the majority of choices correspond to Bayesian updating, the incidence of optimal decisions is higher in sessions with an insurance option. Most subjects given the option to purchase actuarially fair insurance choose to do so, however fewer subjects purchase insurance when the probability of a loss is higher.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Pay One or Pay All: Random Selection of One Choice for Payment
By Susan Laury
-
Further Reflections on Prospect Theory
By Susan Laury and Charles A. Holt
-
Prospect Theory in Choice and Pricing Tasks
By William T. Harbaugh, Kate Krause, ...