Exactions and Burden Distribution in Takings Law

73 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2006  

Carlos A. Ball

Rutgers Law School

Laurie Reynolds

University of Illinois College of Law

Abstract

In the last several decades, there has been a marked shift in local government financing away from the use of general revenue taxes and toward non-tax revenue raising devices such as exactions. We argue that the Supreme Court, in its exaction cases, missed a golden opportunity to slow this troubling trend toward the greater privatization of local government financing. In addition, we explain how the Court's exaction cases are inconsistent with the goal of burden distribution as reflected in the Court's takings jurisprudence. We propose that the constitutional standard applied to exactions be reformulated so as to account explicitly for burden distribution. Such a reformulation will make exactions law more consistent with the purposes of the Takings Clause and will constitute an important first step in restoring a more sensible balance between tax and non-tax revenue devices.

Suggested Citation

Ball, Carlos A. and Reynolds, Laurie, Exactions and Burden Distribution in Takings Law. William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 47, pp. 1513-1585, 2006 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=895705

Carlos A. Ball (Contact Author)

Rutgers Law School ( email )

NJ
United States
973-353-3008 (Phone)

Laurie Reynolds

University of Illinois College of Law

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Rank
237,638
Abstract Views
1,821