Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion: Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory
32 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2006
Date Written: June 2005
Abstract
A growing literature reports the conclusions that: (a) expected utility theory does not provide a plausible theory of risk aversion for both small-stakes and large-stakes gambles; and (b) this decision theory should be replaced with an alternative theory characterized by loss aversion. This paper explains that the arguments in previous literature fail to support these conclusions. Either concavity calibration has no general implication for expected utility theory or it has problematic implications for all decision theories that involve concave transformations (utility or value functions) of positive money payoffs, which makes loss aversion irrelevant to the argument.
Keywords: concavity calibration, expected utility theory, prospect theory, risk aversion
JEL Classification: C90, D81
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times
-
Measuring Intertemporal Preferences Using Response Times
By Christopher F. Chabris, David Laibson, ...
-
Fast or Fair? A Study of Response Times
By Marco Piovesan and Erik Wengström
-
Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model
By David Wolpert, Julian C. Jamison, ...
-
Response Time Under Monetary Incentives: The Ultimatum Game
By Pablo Brañas-garza, Ana Leon-mejia, ...
-
Schelling Formalized: Strategic Choices of Non-Rational Personas
-
The Harmfulness of the EU Theory
By Hak Choi