Alternative Perspectives on Omission Bias

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 28, No. 4, p. 544, August 2005

1 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2006

Abstract

The act/omission distinction is likely to lead to biases and be used as a moral heuristic. However, it is frequently difficult to determine whether this act-omission distinction is responsible for a judgment outside the lab. Furthermore, more encompassing theories of omission bias are needed to make progress in dealing with its harmful consequences. One such theory is briefly presented.

Suggested Citation

Anderson, Christopher J., Alternative Perspectives on Omission Bias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 28, No. 4, p. 544, August 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=895756

Christopher J. Anderson (Contact Author)

Eastern University ( email )

1300 Eagle Rd
St. David's, PA 19086
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
216
Abstract Views
1,277
Rank
258,164
PlumX Metrics