Complementarities in Automobile Production
46 Pages Posted: 18 May 2006 Last revised: 26 Dec 2022
Date Written: April 2006
Abstract
The number of different car and light truck models produced in North America has increased enormously over the last decades. The data suggests that producing this increased variety of vehicles is associated with a productivity penalty. We show that manufacturers can adopt complementary activities to reduce this penalty. Flexible technology, defined as the ability to assemble models derived from different "platforms" on the same assembly line, and bringing previously outsourced activities in-house are two such activities that we identify. Both are costly themselves, in terms of lower productivity, but they reduce the cost of producing greater variety. The results are robust to controlling for the endogeneity of the adoption decisions using activity-specific instruments, as proposed by Athey and Stern (2003).
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Transaction Cost Economics: An Assessment of Empirical Research in the Social Sciences
-
Complementarity Among Vertical Integration Decisions: Evidence from Automobile Product Development
By Sharon Novak and Scott Stern
-
How Does Outsourcing Affect Performance Dynamics? Evidence from the Automobile Industry
By Sharon Novak and Scott Stern
-
By Susan Helper
-
Learning, Complementarities, and Asynchronous Use of Technology
By Boyan Jovanovic and Dmitriy Stolyarov
-
Three-Way Complementarities: Performance Pay, HR Analytics and Information Technology
By Sinan Aral, Erik Brynjolfsson, ...
-
By Sharon Novak and Birger Wernerfelt
-
Integration and Task Allocation: Evidence from Patient Care
By Guy David, Evan Rawley, ...