61 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2006 Last revised: 7 Nov 2008
Date Written: June 10, 2008
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) mandates management evaluation and independent audits of internal control effectiveness. The mandate is costly to firms but may yield benefits through lower information risk that translates into lower cost of equity. We use unaudited pre-SOX 404 disclosures and SOX 404 audit opinions to assess how changes in internal control quality affect firm risk and cost of equity. After controlling for other risk factors, we find that firms with internal control deficiencies have significantly higher idiosyncratic risk, systematic risk, and cost of equity. Our change analyses document that auditor-confirmed changes in internal control effectiveness (including remediation of previously disclosed internal control deficiencies) are followed by significant changes in the cost of equity that range from 50 to 150 basis points. Overall, our cross-sectional and inter-temporal change test results are consistent with internal control reports affecting investors' risk assessments and firms' cost of equity.
Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Firm risk, Cost of Equity
JEL Classification: G12, G18, G34, G38, M41, M45, M49
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Skaife, Hollis Ashbaugh and Collins, Daniel W. and Kinney, Jr., William R. and LaFond, Ryan, The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity (June 10, 2008). Journal of Accounting Research, Forthcoming 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=896760