Overhearing Part of a Conversation: Shutts as a Moment in a Long Dialogue
19 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2006
Date Written: April 17, 2006
Phillips Petroleum v. Shutts, the topic of a recent symposium, looks backwards as well as forwards. In its backwards-looking aspect Shutts suggests what federal diversity jurisdiction might have become. In its forward-looking aspect Shutts suggests the problems that will arise under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. This essay uses Shutts to sketch a new role for diversity jurisdiction, and it uses Shutts' facts to explain how we might begin to resolve the issues that CAFA will create.
Keywords: Shutts, class actions, choice of law, diversity jurisdiction
JEL Classification: K20, K41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Yeazell, Stephen, Overhearing Part of a Conversation: Shutts as a Moment in a Long Dialogue (April 17, 2006). UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 06-19, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=897384 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.897384
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.