The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas

IEW Working Paper No. 280

24 Pages Posted: 27 Apr 2006

See all articles by Bruno S. Frey

Bruno S. Frey

CREMA; University of Basel

Eric W. K. Tsang

Nanyang Technological University (NTU) - Nanyang Business School

Date Written: April 2006

Abstract

Recently, the problems associated with the existing journal review process aroused discussions from seasoned management researchers, who have also made useful suggestions for improving the process. To complement these suggestions, we propose a more radical change: a manuscript should be reviewed on an as is basis and its fate be determined in one round of review. The as-is review process shortens the time period from submission to final acceptance, reduces the workload of editors, referees and authors, provides frank author feedback to referees, and, most important, lets authors own all of the ideas in their publications.

Keywords: Journals, reviews, authors, submissions

JEL Classification: Z0

Suggested Citation

Frey, Bruno S. and Tsang, Eric W. K., The As-Is Journal Review Process: Let Authors Own Their Ideas (April 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=897708 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.897708

Bruno S. Frey (Contact Author)

CREMA ( email )

Südstrasse 11
Zurich, CH 8008
Switzerland
+41 44 380 00 78 (Phone)

University of Basel ( email )

Peter Merian-Weg 6
Basel, 4002
Switzerland

Eric W. K. Tsang

Nanyang Technological University (NTU) - Nanyang Business School ( email )

Mailbox No. BIA-08
Singapore 639798
Singapore

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
rank
176,277
Abstract Views
1,460
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information