Bayes vs. Resampling: A Rematch
Journal of Investment Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, First Quarter 2008
36 Pages Posted: 26 Apr 2006
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
We replay an investment game that compares the performance of a player using Bayesian methods for determining portfolio weights with a player that uses the Monte Carlo based resampling approach advocated in Michaud (1998). Markowitz and Usmen (2003) showed that the Michaud player always won. However, in the original experiment, the Bayes player was handicapped because the algorithm that was used to evaluate the predictive distribution of the portfolio provided only a rough approximation. We level the playing field by allowing the Bayes player to use a more standard algorithm. Our results sharply contrast with those of the original game. The final part of our paper proposes a new investment game that is much more relevant for the average investor - a one-period ahead asset allocation. For this game, the Bayes player always wins.
Keywords: Bayesian decision problem, parameter uncertainty, optimal portfolios, utility function maximization, resampling
JEL Classification: G11, G12, C11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Andrew Ang, Joseph Chen, ...
-
By Joseph Chen, Andrew Ang, ...
-
Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments
By Campbell R. Harvey, John Liechty, ...
-
Optimal Portfolio Allocation Under Higher Moments
By Eric Jondeau and Michael Rockinger
-
Optimal Portfolio Allocation Under Higher Moments
By Eric Jondeau and Michael Rockinger
-
Optimal Portfolio Choice Under Regime Switching, Skew and Kurtosis Preferences
By Allan Timmermann and Massimo Guidolin
-
Downside Correlation and Expected Stock Returns
By Andrew Ang, Joseph Chen, ...
-
Modeling Asymmetry and Excess Kurtosis in Stock Return Data
By Gamini Premaratne and Anil K. Bera
-
Is Beta Still Alive? Conclusive Evidence from the Swiss Stock Market
By Dušan Isakov