Online Arbitration: Binding or Non-Binding?

ADR Online Monthly, November 2002

22 Pages Posted: 3 May 2006

See all articles by Thomas Schultz

Thomas Schultz

King's College London; University of Geneva; Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (IHEID) - Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement (CIDS); Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies

Abstract

In cyberspace, parties meet that would often not have met in the offline world, because they physically live in far-away countries or on different continents. Outside cyberspace, ordinary consumers do usually not enter international agreements. In cyberspace, they engage in small or medium transactions, which they would usually not have done in the offline world. In these cases, courts are too expensive—mainly because of costs of filing, travel and legal counsel—and they are too slow.

Alternative dispute resolution methods except arbitration are often not effective enough, because they produce case outcomes that are not legally binding enough. Such methods only engender contracts - if they work. To be enforceable by state authorities, contracts again require a judgement -which is too expensive. As it is expensive, the winning party will have only limited incentives to go to court, and the losing party will also have only limited incentive to obey the contract, because it is unlikely to become enforceable.

Arbitration could provide this effectiveness, because the recourse to courts is only minimal and therefore much less expensive. But from this legal effectiveness follow other difficulties. Arbitration requires the parties to give up rights, which does not induce trust and which is the reason why arbitration currently still faces a series of legal obstacles. For consumer claims, where the cost problem is greatest, there is for instance a problem of arbitrability under a number of laws.

So how should small and medium-sized disputes by resolved in cyberspace?

Non-binding arbitration - a dispute resolution process akin to arbitration, but not binding under the public legal system, its effectiveness relying on in-built enforcement mechanisms - may be an answer to this question. Non-binding arbitration, I contend in this article, may in fact be more binding than traditional arbitration, because it is effective without being subject to so many legal obstacles, and it may be designed so as to avoid many issues related to costs.

Keywords: Online dispute resolution, cyberspace, Internet, e-commerce, arbitration, non-binding arbitration, self-enforcement, effectiveness

JEL Classification: K4, K40, K2, K20

Suggested Citation

Schultz, Thomas, Online Arbitration: Binding or Non-Binding?. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=898622

Thomas Schultz (Contact Author)

King's College London ( email )

Somerset House East Wing
Strand
London, WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

University of Geneva ( email )

102 Bd Carl-Vogt
Genève, CH - 1205
Switzerland

Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (IHEID) - Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement (CIDS) ( email )

Villa Moynier
Rue de Lausanne 120b
Geneva, 12011
Switzerland

Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies ( email )

Geneva
Switzerland

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
895
rank
24,964
Abstract Views
4,455
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information