Louisiana's Conflicts Codification: Some Empirical Observations Regarding Decisional Predictability

10 Pages Posted: 8 May 2006

Abstract

In 1992, Louisiana became the first (and still the only) state to codify its choice-of-law doctrine. The conflicts rules that it created in statutory form are far removed from the pre-conflicts-revolution rules such as the lex loci delicti rule in tort cases. Rather, the Louisiana codification consists of somewhat softer and narrower rules. This article attempts to measure whether this codification has produced any improvement in decisional predictability in Louisiana courts. As a proxy for decisional predictability it uses the affirmance rates of Louisiana courts in conflicts case before and after the codification. The article concludes that the Louisiana codification produced a statistically significant increase in the affirmance rate and thus by inference in the decisional predictablity of Louisiana conflicts decisions.

Keywords: conflict of laws, choice of law, Louisiana, codification

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K33, K39

Suggested Citation

Borchers, Patrick Joseph, Louisiana's Conflicts Codification: Some Empirical Observations Regarding Decisional Predictability. Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 1061, 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=899635

Patrick Joseph Borchers (Contact Author)

Creighton University School of Law ( email )

2500 California Plaza
Omaha, NE 68178
United States
402-280-3009 (Phone)
402-280-3161 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://culaw2.creighton.edu

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
2,080
Rank
371,516
PlumX Metrics