Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=900258
 
 

Citations (9)



 
 

Footnotes (98)



 


 



When Does Deliberating Improve Decisionmaking?


Mathew D. McCubbins


Department of Political Science and Law School, Duke University

Daniel B. Rodriguez


Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law


Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, Vol. 15, 2006
San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-47
1st Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper

Abstract:     
The promise of deliberation in small-group settings is a key theme in the modern political theory of public decisionmaking. Scholars of various stripes have insisted that social welfare can be enhanced - indeed, considerably enhanced - by procedures that are discursive and deliberative. This hypothesis has seldom, however, been tested empirically. More often than not, the case for deliberation as a means for welfare-enhancement is defended on purely theoretical grounds. Frequently, the argument rests on exclusively normative assertions, such as the view that collections of individuals in should communicate candidly with one another in order to increase the information available within the group and to expand the feasible set of desirable policies. On other occasions, scholars advance the argument that deliberation will occur and will improve social welfare. These latter arguments, we show, rest on dubious empirical bases. Through experiments, we raise doubts about the empirical case for deliberation. And, in the end, we question whether any of the theories and results that support deliberation as an element in a fruitful decisionmaking process can be separated from "expertise" systems, systems more characteristic of the modern administrative state.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: deliberation, cemocratic decisionmaking, experimental

JEL Classification: C90, D72, D78, D81


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2006  

Suggested Citation

McCubbins, Mathew D. and Rodriguez, Daniel B., When Does Deliberating Improve Decisionmaking?. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, Vol. 15, 2006; San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 07-47; 1st Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=900258

Contact Information

Mathew D. McCubbins
Department of Political Science and Law School, Duke University ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Daniel B. Rodriguez (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,554
Downloads: 303
Download Rank: 76,031
Citations:  9
Footnotes:  98