Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford V. Levinson

Pierce Law Review, Vol. 4, p. 207, 2006

University of New Hampshire Law Review, Vol. 4, p. 207, 2006

12 Pages Posted: 4 May 2006 Last revised: 5 Oct 2011

Seth Barrett Tillman

National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

This article is published in conjunction with my MODEL CONTINUITY OF CONGRESS STATUTE. Professor Sanford V. Levinson in a comment, appearing with the MODEL, has voiced legal and prudential objections to my proposed statutory solution. This Reply responds to those objections.

My opening article appears at: Tillman, Model, 4 PIERCE LAW REVIEW 191 (2006), also appearing at, http://ssrn.com/abstract=891560. Professor Sanford V. Levinson comments on my Model at: Levinson, Comment, Assuring Continuity of Government, 4 PIERCE LAW REVIEW 201 (2006), also appearing at, http://ssrn.com/abstract=900607. I reply to his comment at: Tillman, Reply, Overruling INS v. Chadha, 4 PIERCE LAW REVIEW 207 (2006), also appearing at, http://ssrn.com/abstract=900589.

Since publication, Pierce Law Review has been renamed University of New Hampshire Law Review.

Keywords: continuity, congress, textualist, Chadha

Suggested Citation

Tillman, Seth Barrett, Overruling INS v. Chadha: Advice on Choreography - A Reply to Professor Sanford V. Levinson (2006). University of New Hampshire Law Review, Vol. 4, p. 207, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=900589

Seth Barrett Tillman (Contact Author)

National University of Ireland, Maynooth (NUI Maynooth) - Faculty of Law ( email )

Ollscoil na hÉireann, Má Nuad
New House (#306)
Maynooth, County Kildare
Ireland
(353) (0) 1474-7216 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.nuim.ie/staff/mr-seth-barrett-tillman

Paper statistics

Downloads
341
Rank
71,389
Abstract Views
2,374